We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.

PLAN8

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 83 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: WordPress Plugin 4.5.2 data Vulnerability Issue #69491
    PLAN8
    Customer

    This flags up my previous repeated requests for the V3D export locally option to ONLY export the essential required HTML app files and none of the V3D, Blender and other unused files –

    As a non-coder, the export locally option is very un “Artist Friendly”, as there is no clear explanation as to which files are required for the HTML app only – it is not an easy task at all to go through the exported files and try and work out what are the actual HTML app files, and what are the puzzle files and blender files etc –

    PLEASE can you make the export locally option respect the option that is made checkable in the app manager “general settings”? I really don’t understand why this hasn’t been done – it makes no sense at all, and now with this vulnerability issue, it would help resolve this if the upload app manager in WordPress was only uploading a known set of file types because the exported app locally only contains the required files for a website. If that makes sense?

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: Potential V 4.0.0 shader bug #68957
    PLAN8
    Customer

    Ahh, so it is! My mistake, sorry!

    I can confirm that the emission shader in BSDF is now working for me! thank you!

    in reply to: Potential V 4.0.0 shader bug #68956
    PLAN8
    Customer

    Ahh, so it is! My mistake, sorry!

    I can confirm that the emission shader in BSDF is now working for me! thank you!

    in reply to: Potential V 4.0.0 shader bug #68952
    PLAN8
    Customer

    Sadly, I think I still have the same problem – see screenshot looking through the backside of a thin surface with double sided render settings and opaque blend mode enables with AO.

    • This reply was modified 5 months, 2 weeks ago by PLAN8.
    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: How to upload verge3d on my own server!? #68917
    PLAN8
    Customer

    Yep, but if there is an option to export the web files only (to the Verge server), why isnt there an option to export the web files only locally?

    in reply to: Camera Collision Material #68915
    PLAN8
    Customer

    OK, understood – thanks!

    in reply to: How to upload verge3d on my own server!? #68913
    PLAN8
    Customer

    I just tested that, the export to local zip file doesn’t respect that option – all files are included in the zip file

    in reply to: How to upload verge3d on my own server!? #68912
    PLAN8
    Customer

    Hi,

    I believe that only works for uploading to the V3D server? I don’t think that applies for local export? Might be wrong!

    in reply to: Camera Collision Material #68911
    PLAN8
    Customer

    OK, thanks – I understand.

    But technically, would it be possible to have a list of multiple collision materials? because that would save the work of making a collision mesh and its own material.

    in reply to: Add export app to computer button #68906
    PLAN8
    Customer

    Yep – this is the simplest and quickest solution IMHO

    I can imagine, that wouldn’t be too hard to implement either

    in reply to: Camera Collision Material #68905
    PLAN8
    Customer

    Ah, OK, I didn’t think about adding an invisible mesh – however, that still would require duplicating everything which is quite time consuming and adds extra data to be transferred for the web delivery which makes it less efficient all round?

    in reply to: How to upload verge3d on my own server!? #68903
    PLAN8
    Customer

    Please see my quite old thread and request for improvement on this function here …

    https://www.soft8soft.com/topic/add-export-app-to-computer-button/

    Basically, it is a request to make this workflow considerably easier, clearer and more efficient as currently, exporting the Verge3D application folder exports EVERYTHING including the Blender and V3d backend files. It is required to manually and painstakingly prune out the unnecessary files and folders for the web version, but this is no easy task and requires intimate coder level knowledge of what files are not required for the HTML version to work.

    Put simply, it is not user friendly and breaks the idea that V3d is as simple as possible for artists that don’t understand the coding side.

    • This reply was modified 5 months, 2 weeks ago by PLAN8.
    in reply to: Add export app to computer button #68900
    PLAN8
    Customer

    Dragging this up again as it seems a must to me –

    A button to export only the required HTML/web based set of files only that doesn’t include files that are not required for the web version (ie all the Verge3D and blender files as well as unused textures etc).

    Or, make the Verge3D folder hierarchy keep the exportable HTML files separated from the design and backend files in the first place so that manual export or copy of the web ready files is a simple case of copy and paste.

    It really does seem like this should be a standard part of the workflow to me, given that the whole point of Verge3D is to enable Blender to Web processing.

    • This reply was modified 5 months, 2 weeks ago by PLAN8.
    in reply to: Camera Collision Material #68898
    PLAN8
    Customer

    Hi, sorry to drag this up again, but I think this is a bit of a limitation. It would be good to be able to create surfaces/materials that the camera cannot pass through in all camera navigation view options, or at least orbit as well.

    Also, on the same vein, Having the ability to select only one collision material in first person view is particularly limiting IMHO. It means that in an example of a 3D property tour, the entire building including all the separate rooms would have to have the floors and wall all on one material – whilst I can see this can be done by making a material with multiple material slots, this is also limiting as the individual “rooms” would require a shared material – all in all it is quite limiting.

    The ability to select multiple collision materials seems like a necessity to me in many scenarios.

    Thanks for the potential improvement consideration

    • This reply was modified 5 months, 2 weeks ago by PLAN8.
    in reply to: Z buffering? issue with Ambient Occlusion enabled #68891
    PLAN8
    Customer

    Note – I am only seeing the AO through the “backside” of the material – IE it’s a thin surface with no thickness, from the frontside, the material renders correctly, through the backside (with double-sided faces enabled) you can see the AO through the material.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 83 total)