- This topic has 11 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 2 months ago by
.
-
Hello again,
I have reached some almost ok shader for my semi transparent plastic boxes, but i get some bad graphics issues (see picture).The object is from Nurbs STEP file, so the polygons are not very good, and we can see that when we move around the object.
Beside full remodel of the objects (very long, and customer will not pay for that, as he provides nice steps files), any idea for the shader ?
Here is the verge test :
https://cdn.soft8soft.com/AROAJSY2GOEHMOFUVPIOE:5c0bd316e1/applications/SundisTest2/SundisTest2.htmlHere is the max file :
https://we.tl/t-MKCWMesHUCAny help would be nice.
Attachments:
"1+1=3... for large values of 1"
Here it is :
https://we.tl/t-qdCQ5lbtcYAs you will see i have 3 boxes , one (center one) is the main one, in opaque shader, and looks great in verge3D;
then i have the 2 tests with translucent shaders, in 2 differents mesh import (from nurbs).
As mentionned in my other post, i’m trying to reach this kind of shader (see pictures, please).
thanks.
"1+1=3... for large values of 1"
I’ve made some tests with alpha coverage transp tpe and came with this result. You also need to uncheck gltf 2.0 compatible checkbox. I think this is the best that can be achieved with verge3d.
Attachments:
Co-founder and lead graphics specialist at Soft8Soft.
Sorry, but i don’t find alpha coverage choice.
Attachments:
"1+1=3... for large values of 1"
You need to wait 3.8 release or use last 3.8 pre.
I’ve installer pre4 of v3.8 (no production in progress, so i can try beta
And bugs are gone, thank you !"1+1=3... for large values of 1"
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.